May 13, 2020

What equipment still concerns insurers, loss adjusters, risk managers and operators?

Turbines, generators and transformers, between others. This is because of their cost, complexity, and exposure to potential large interruption periods when a loss occurs. This is particularly especial when damage is not that evident.

The photos below have caused interruption periods of many months (and years), yet the damage was not very clear from the outset.

What are the difficulties in assessing the extent of damage and reinstatement options of these equipment in Latin America?

Lack of OEM presence, elevated costs claimed from local suppliers, cost estimates not according to international standards, unavailability of components and long lead times, lack of local expertise, political risks, and many others.

Does it make sense for the same team of Forensic Engineers and Technical Experts to do the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Reinstatement Assessment?

Definitely, there are major links between an RCA and a reinstatement assessment, for example, the study of equipment behaviour in the months prior to a loss event and how this could have been gradually deteriorating over time, or it was reaching its end of life (i.e. RCA is wear and tear, and reinstatement either not payable or replacement is almost mandatory).

It is important to reduce the points of contact and requests for information at a critical level, as we know that RFI delays are quite common in Latin America.

In the same site inspection performed for the RCA, the Experts can gather enough evidence to begin the reinstatement assessment, thus saving time and costs.

What is crucial about Reinstatement Assessment in Power Plants?

We mentioned above the importance of turbines, generators and transformers. What we haven’t mentioned yet is how do we prepare a reinstatement plan.

This is our day to day, when assigned to review both the root cause and the reinstatement options for critical equipment we assess:

  1. The operational behaviour of the equipment in the year(s) prior to the loss event (i.e. the trends). This is done by a technical study of the operational data of the equipment, such as vibration, temperature, speed, and many others. This can be directly extracted from the SCADA system of the plant, or built from different monitoring devices (e.g. independent thermocouples,  sensors, etc). We have written in a few occasions of the importance of IIoT (Industrial Internet of Things) and Big Data for predictive analytics, so operators can avoid catastrophic damages and insurers facing very large claims. (See  C OVID-19 and Plant/Machinery Claims. Partial Solution => IIoT  and  The industrial internet of things (IIoT)
  2. The full maintenance and servicing background of the plant overall and the damaged equipment. We start by reviewing the OEM’s guidelines, and having a good understanding of the maintenance regimes of key components over time, which will help us to build a detailed timeline of how the plant has been maintained and when advice from service providers has or has not been followed by operators. We compare actual regimes with industry standards, in order to inform insurers the adherence or otherwise of these.
  3. We perform detailed inspections of all components in the affected equipment and similar “unaffected” models in order to compare and contrast, determine what is repairable and what is BER (beyond economical repair), and we perform NDTs (non-destructive testing) when possible. All this evidence is gathered in a forensic and careful manner, in order to utilise these facts if a case turns legal either by subrogation, or for separate disputes where we act as expert witnesses.
  4. We conduct detailed meetings with the operators in order to understand their views from the outset, their verbal comments on RCA and extent of damage, details on recommended local vendors, and also to understand the chances of other non-loss related works that could later be confused with the claim (the “opportunity” works).
  5. We catalogue all the affected equipment and components, and build a detailed table of damages, repair scenarios, costs, timings, and of course we provide our expert recommendations on the best reinstatement options.
  6. We monitor the works and liaise with all relevant vendors in order to guarantee that the works are performed on time and with the right quality, whilst closely monitoring any eventualities in order to propose solutions quickly and effectively, always in an economical manner.

Do you know what are Waste to Energy Plants (Wte) and that these have a reduced life expectancy?


Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

In general, we know that in classical power plants, turbines and generators can have a life expectancy of more than 50 years, if adequately maintained. However, waste to energy plants are different. Basically, the energy plant works by burning waste at high temperatures and using the heat to make steam which then drives a turbine, which later connects to a generator – directly or through a gearbox, and this generates electricity. The real life expectancy of key equipment in these plants  is  20-25 years  because of the aggressive environment these operate at. For example:

1. ABB, a world renowned manufacturer, specifically states:

A generator in a waste management plant has a normal life expectancy of 25 year ”. Moreover, ABB show in this article an example in a waste to energy plant in Denmark where the generator had only been running for 10 years, and their LEAP analysis showed a life expectancy left of 1-2 years (e.g. 12 years maximum).

2. A Public Department paper in the UK also shows the following:

Over the average 25 year planned lifetime of an energy from waste plant, the balance of the many factors that need to be considered to determine if it is the best solution may have changed.  Once that planned lifetime has been reached it should not be automatically assumed that extending a plant lifetime beyond that originally envisaged will continue to deliver the same outcomes, although it may do. At this point all options including continued use and/or modification, through to closure and development of a new solution should be considered.”

DAC  has also first-hand information from OEM’s themselves, that agree that  25 years  is a realistic estimate (e.g. ELIN Motoren).

Although Waste to Energy plants are not that numerous in LATAM, studies show that there is a high trend for these to increase in the following years, especially when supported by Local Governments. According to the following article:  “ Latin America’s waste-to-energy market is set to depict a growth in revenue…. Mexico, Brazil and countries in Rest of Latin America together constitute the Latin American market for waste-to-energy.

See Video on Wte plant in Mexico City:

With local presence in Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela, as well as representatives in all of the Americas, Europe and Asia,  DAC  can perform both on site and desktop investigations to the required forensic detail, supporting the detailed task of loss adjusters and claim managers in determining the root cause of plant failure, as well as its reinstatement options.

About the autor: 

Daniel A. Correa ,  CEng, MIET, MIMechE, MPD, ACIArb  Managing Director at DAC Consulting

Daniel A. Correa  is the Managing Director of  DAC Consulting , based in  London, UK. Daniel is a Chartered Mechanical Engineer and Project Manager. He obtained his Mechanical Engineering degree from the Universidad Metropolitana in Venezuela, later completed a Master’s of Science in Engineering Project Management from the University of Manchester (UK), and is completing further studies from the University of Cambridge Judge Business School in the UK.

Daniel has acted as a Forensic Engineer and Expert Witness in dozens of cases worldwide, with a primary focus in EMEA, LATAM, and Asia.

Daniel is of the view that information sharing is of crucial importance for the insurance industry, especially for the investigation of large and complex matters. For this reason, his strategic position in London gives him a superb level of experience, which has allowed him to present in many forums worldwide, and aims at enriching the industry for its continuous growth over the years to come.

About  DAC Consulting  and Latin America

DAC’s experts are assigned as independent technical experts and  forensic engineers   for insurers, loss adjusters, brokers, and lawyers, when it comes to equipment failure, fires, contamination, and other perils. We assess the root cause of major and complex equipment losses, as well as the extent of damage, reinstatement options and timeline review for plants such as: refineries, power plants, offshore platforms, manufacturing plants, construction projects; and equipment such as: turbines, compressors, pumps, piping/pipelines, heat exchangers, vessels, tanks, generators, transformers, and many others.

With decades of experience in the Power and Oil & Gas Industry,  DAC counts with over 50 experts worldwide , in specialist engineering fields such as: mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, piping/pipeline, process/chemical, civil/structural, materials, drilling, geothermal, SURF, HVAC, scheduling/delay analysis, cost estimation/quantum, commercial.

DAC Consulting looks at not only the technical elements of the reinstatement plans, but crucially at the schedules in order to mitigate any possible Business interruption (BI), as we know Business Interruption could be at least 3 times the cost of the Property/Physical Damage (PD). Similarly, we perform highly detailed delay analyses for DSU claims.

DAC Consulting has built over the years not only a good relationship with OEM’s and service providers, but also a good database on equipment costs, delivery times, installation costs, expert networks, and many others. This is crucial when estimating initial costs and interruption periods, and it is also crucial when discussing with local vendors and managing to reduce elevated initial estimates and “opportunity” works.

To serve the Latin American market we have a central hub in London, to connect the reinsurance markets with our local representatives, and experts in different countries, starting from the US, followed by  MexicoColombia  and  Venezuela. Whilst we continue to expand our pool of experts in LATAM, we continue to train our personnel in order to improve our expert roles and cost efficiency in large and complex matters.

by Daniel Correa 15 Apr, 2024
In the intricate and highly specialized realm of engineering and construction, disputes and claims are not just common—they are expected.
by Daniel Correa 03 Apr, 2024
DAC Consulting Services is proud to have attended and sponsored this impressive event, which confirms our investment in the Middle East and North Africa region.
by Daniel Correa 19 Mar, 2024
Reflections on the SCCA24 Conference: Shaping the Future of Arbitration in Riyadh
30 Dec, 2023
Merry Xmas to everyone! May this season fill you all with hope, happiness,  kindness, wisdom, and faith.
21 Dec, 2023
WORLD CLASS FORENSIC & TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
24 Nov, 2023
Over the past year, expert witnesses have appeared in the legal press following criticism in the courts. So for this year’s Sir Michael Davies lecture, we invited The Honourable Mr Justice Williams, High Court judge and chair of The Family Justice Council Subcommittee on Experts, to share his views on such criticism. In his enlightening keynote speech – which you can listen to in full here – Mr Justice Williams explored an array of issues relating to the criticism of experts. Distinguishing between constructive criticism, destructive criticism and disagreement, he guided the audience through criticism in the context of the work he’s doing with the Family Justice Council, along with recent judicial commentary on expert evidence. He also made excellent suggestions around what to do if you find yourself being criticised as an expert, as well as how to avoid finding yourself in that situation in the first place. We’ve summarised some of the key takeaways below. Constructive vs destructive Criticism isn’t all bad, Mr Justice Williams noted. Constructive feedback to an expert can help improve the way that other experts approach courts in the future — and that can only be a good thing. But judges are aware of the importance of protecting experts from unfair, destructive criticism. “Criticism in a judgement can have adverse consequences in terms of [experts’] reputation, referrals to professional bodies, and on business”, Mr Justice Williams noted. All experts should remember, though, that disagreement from a judge is not necessarily criticism. “Don’t be too sensitive!”, he reminded the audience. Common criticism A lack of preparation, failure to abide by court directions, going beyond remit or expertise, and poor presentation on paper and on screen are all areas where experts commonly face criticism. The possibility of being criticised in court was highlighted as a barrier for attracting experts – though it’s important to note that it was by no means the biggest barrier. “As the judiciary, it’s entirely within our hands to manage criticism of experts”, Mr Justice Williams acknowledged. Efforts to change the way that criticism is managed have been made in the family law arena, with the establishment of a working group, the Family Justice Council Sub-Committee on Experts. The good, the bad and the ugly Mr Justice Williams highlighted three areas likely to put you in a positive light in the eyes of a High Court judge: the ability to express complex concepts in accessible language; objectivity and staying within the bounds of your expertise; and, of course, sticking to the facts. At the opposite end of the spectrum, being unprepared; not abiding by court directions; and going beyond your remit or expertise are all traits that are likely to attract criticism from a judge. As for the ugly – make sure that your presentation on paper and on screen is up to scratch! How to avoid destructive criticism No Expert Witnesses want to attract destructive criticism. To help avoid it altogether, Mr Justice Williams’ top tips included: don’t take on too much; comply with timetables; and communicate any difficulties. “Can’t complete the work in the time you thought you would? Let us know and we can do something about it”, Mr Justice Williams pointed out. Importantly, he said, remember the fundamentals of being an expert: comply with your subject matter expertise and with procedural codes. Managing criticism “If you’re being criticised in court, the best position to take is to remain as objective as possible and try to give considered answers”, is Mr Justice Williams’ advice for managing criticism. “If you need it, ask for time to respond.” If you’re facing criticism, seek support: the Expert Witness Institute fulfils that mentoring and support role. “Destructive criticism can also be valuable as a learning process in itself”, Mr Justice Williams reminded us. “It illustrates to the broader community that bad practice is a part of everyone learning.” The happy judge Judges are very busy people – that’s partly why the presentation of expert reports, with an executive summary of four pages, is so important. “If you’re clear in your conclusion with clear and practical advice with a range of opinions, where relevant, the judge is going to be on your side to start with”, Mr Justice Williams said. “If you’ve got a happy judge, even if you’re robustly cross examined, having the judge on side is something to value.” The audience were reminded that criticism is not all bad. In fact, it is rare, and it is relatively easily avoided. Ultimately: “The judiciary want experts to continue being experts, we want you to enjoy being an expert, and we don’t like criticising (although we all like a robust exchange of views).” Listen to the full lecture Access the recording of the Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2023 – you’ll also get a CPD Certificate worth ¾ hour.
13 Oct, 2023
WORLD CLASS FORENSIC & TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
20 Sept, 2023
¿Qué repercusiones tendrá en el sector asegurador? Empecemos señalando que, hasta el momento, en México, específicamente en la Ciudad de México, no había un lineamiento claro sobre cómo se deben evaluar las estructuras y, posteriormente, cómo deberían ser rehabilitadas. La falta de una norma específica no implica que, hasta ahora, este proceso se hiciera mal, sino que la variedad de criterios para considerar que los daños en un edificio son sujetos de un proyecto de rehabilitación es muy grande y depende enteramente de la experiencia del ingeniero a cargo. Para dar un poco de contexto, la CDMX tiene varias Normas Técnicas Complementarias (NTC) que, como su nombre lo dice, complementan de forma técnica al Reglamento de Construcciones. Dichas NTC, proporcionan los requisitos y criterios para el diseño de los elementos estructurales de un edificio, por ejemplo, una columna de concreto, un contraviento de acero o una pila en la cimentación. Durante agosto y septiembre, el Gobierno de la Ciudad de México realizó un ciclo de conferencias en el Colegio de Ingenieros Civiles de México, para presentar las actualizaciones a las NTC publicadas en 2017 y para presentar una norma nueva que es muy necesaria y que, desde mi punto de vista, tendrá un gran impacto en la forma en la que el sector asegurador revisa las propiedades ya sea para evaluar el riesgo o para cuantificar los daños. Lo que pretende la nueva norma es proveer la metodología para evaluar una estructura y los requisitos mínimos para su rehabilitación, en caso de ser necesaria. Aunque esta NTC es aplicable a todos los EDIFICIOS (no aplica a otras estructuras como puentes o tanques de almacenamiento) en la CDMX, independientemente de si tienen daño visible o no, en este artículo me enfocaré únicamente en lo que ocurrirá con los que sí tienen daños, es decir, los que se verán involucrados en una reclamación de seguros. La NTC está dividida en 13 capítulos y 2 apéndices, los cuales, a su vez, hacen referencia a las NTC aplicables del material estructural a rehabilitar. En los siguientes párrafos abordaré de forma general el objetivo de cada uno y sus implicaciones más relevante.
11 Sept, 2023
We're proud to announce that our Managing Director, Mr Daniel Correa is a guest speaker at this year's Istanbul Arbitration Week 2023
29 Aug, 2023
Carbon Capture: The Real Energy Transition. What is carbon capture, and why should we focus on that as a climate solution rather than end our reliance on fossil fuels right now?
More posts
Share by: