The Role of Seismic Isolation in Reducing Earthquake Risk and Insurance Exposure in Mexican Infrastructure

17 December 2025

The Role of Seismic Isolation in Reducing Earthquake Risk and Insurance Exposure in Mexican Infrastructure

Mexico's seismic activity poses a significant challenge for infrastructure resilience, particularly in densely populated and economically vital areas. Structural damage from earthquakes has traditionally resulted in substantial insured and uninsured losses, affecting not only the built environment but also public services, economic stability, and legal responsibilities. One of the most effective measures for reducing these risks in buildings and bridges is the implementation of seismic isolators. These systems detach structures from ground motion, decreasing seismic forces transferred to the superstructure.

Seismic Isolation: Engineering Principles and Practical Impact

Seismic isolators are placed between a structure's foundation and its superstructure. They work by increasing the building’s natural period (how the building shakes or vibrates), thus shifting it away from the main frequencies of earthquake movement, and by absorbing energy through controlled deformation. Isolators come in various forms: elastomeric bearings (including lead-rubber bearings), friction pendulum systems, and high-damping rubber bearings. Each type offers different combinations of flexibility, damping, and load capacity.

In the context of bridges and public buildings, seismic isolation systems have proven their ability to reduce peak accelerations and inter-story drifts, thus limiting structural and non-structural damage. During recent earthquakes in Turkey and New Zealand, isolated hospitals and public structures remained operational, while conventional buildings required extensive repairs. This continuity of function is vital not only from an engineering perspective but also from a financial and legal point of view.

Distinction Between Seismic and Non-Seismic Neoprene Bearings

While neoprene bearings are common in both seismic and non-seismic zones, their specifications differ markedly. In non-seismic settings, these bearings mainly accommodate thermal expansion and minor movements (commonly used in bridges). However, in seismic areas, elastomeric isolators are specially designed with embedded steel plates, bonded layers, and sometimes energy-dissipating cores (e.g., lead) to resist large horizontal displacements. The detailing, anchorage, and manufacturing quality of these isolators are essential for their seismic performance. Assuming all neoprene bearings provide seismic protection is a widespread misconception that can lead to legal and insurance issues if structures perform poorly during earthquakes.

Insurance Relevance: Lowering Risk Exposure Through Isolation

The inclusion of seismic isolators in a structure’s design can significantly change its risk profile. By lowering the likelihood and extent of structural damage, isolation systems help reduce expected losses, an important factor in determining insurance premiums. In markets like Japan and New Zealand, insurers already consider base isolation a risk-reducing feature, occasionally offering premium discounts or more favourable cover conditions.

Although such practices are still emerging in Mexico, the trend towards performance-based engineering and advanced risk modelling is growing. Mexican updates to structural codes, such as the 2023 revisions to Mexico City’s design standards, have begun to recognise seismic isolation as a viable strategy, especially for hospitals and government buildings. Insurers and legal advisors assessing claims or underwriting policies must now consider whether an isolated structure presents a lower risk.

Expert Witness Perspective: Documenting Performance and Design Intent

When seismic damage occurs, expert witnesses often assess whether mitigation measures were implemented, maintained, and functioning as intended. For isolated structures, this involves examining design documentation, installation records, maintenance logs, and structural response data. The expert must also determine whether failures were caused by improper isolation design, installation errors, or the complete absence of isolation.

In litigation or arbitration, having properly designed and documented isolation systems can demonstrate due diligence. Conversely, failing to isolate in high-risk zones or using generic neoprene pads without seismic capabilities might be considered a failure to meet expected

performance standards.

Conclusion

Seismic isolation is a vital point where engineering innovation meets risk management. For the Mexican insurance and legal sectors, understanding how isolation systems lessen vulnerability can lead to more precise risk assessments, better-informed underwriting decisions, and stronger defence or prosecution of claims. As regulations change and awareness grows, expert assessment of seismic isolation will become a crucial part of resolving infrastructure disputes.

At DAC Consulting Services, we assist insurers and legal professionals in evaluating the technical merits of seismic mitigation strategies. Our team combines structural engineering expertise with forensic insight to ensure that isolation systems are correctly understood and applied in the context of insurance claims and legal proceedings.

Written by Miguel Hernández

Click here for Miguel's bio Our Core Group